
I decided to focus this blog on our class discussion a few days back and the thoughts and ideas it generated for me. I also would like to stress these thoughts are my own personal feelings and not meant to be directed at any one person who may disagree. If you disagree with what I have to say I will not be offended by any comments you might leave. In fact I would welcome them. After all this is a learning experience and if we're afraid of opinions we won't ever strengthen our own.
I would like to start off by revisiting the subject of teachers' roles in regards to molding a student's primary or secondary Discourse(just for clarification I will be using the same capitalization scheme as in the reading). I still stand by the assertion I made that as teachers, our primary responsibility is to teach students our specific content in a way that they will understand it. That is what our employers expect of us, that is what parents expect from us, and quite frankly that is what our students expect from us. Now please don't mistake me for a cold-hearted, only logical never feeling, constantly analytic math teacher. I'm not. I don't want to be and hope I never will be. It is just a fact that remains a part of our profession. To quote a professor at our very own university who, among other classes, teaches a classroom management course, "You're not hired to be their friend, you're hired to be their teacher."
I think the temptation is there for all of us to want to make something more out of our students than they enter the year with. It's a natural inclination for all of us. If we weren't compassionate and caring towards others we wouldn't be working so hard to get a job that pays so little and requires so much. So I fault no teacher who has a desire to reach out and help a struggling student become a "better" person by somehow influencing their primary Discourse. But who's to say what a better person really is? I certainly can't help a student of Jewish heritage become a better Jew. I wouldn't even know where to start to with a student from South America in order to make that student a better person according to their culture. And I wouldn't even attempt to try and make a young lady a better woman because her entire gender confuses the heck out of me (just ask my wife). The list could go on but I think you get the point. I'm not qualified to make those kind of judgments about students. My Discourse is not shared by them. When teachers try and force good values and beliefs onto their students they can often time do more harm than good. It's just not something I think we as teachers should be doing.
Now I would like to make special mention of the word force that I used in the paragraph above. To force or even try to force a set of beliefs or values on a student is wrong. However, that doesn't mean that we should be lifeless blobs that are only good for reciting facts. No, we are people of value too. We have a primary Discourse as well as many secondary Discourses. It's part of who we are and without them we wouldn't be teaching. We shouldn't hide them at all. But wait you might say, doesn't that go against what you just said about not forcing things on students? I don't believe so would be my response. By being ourselves we are exposing our students to a Discourse. However, the distinction comes by us not extending our Discourse beyond ourselves or evaluating our students based solely on that Discourse. Part of learning is making choices. By being ourselves we are only throwing more options into the pot of Discourses that a student can choose from. As long as their choice is free from our direct influence I believe we have stayed within out bounds.
I also really liked the comment in class about how removing bias from our teaching is impossible because we wouldn't be teachers if we weren't biased towards our subject. With this concept I heartily agree but I would question the word choice slightly. I think enthusiasm would be a better word. To me enthusiasm is a driving force, something that motivates us to become better than we currently are. On the other hand, I think bias is judgmental in nature and a lens through which we evaluate others. I believe it is possible to have enthusiasm, and indeed I encourage it, without having bias. To put it more concretely, I love math and will teach it with passion but I will never dislike students solely because they don't share my love. That's what I meant when I said we need to eliminate bias from our teaching. It's the judgmental aspect that has no place in a classroom designed to foster learning. If we can master that then I know every student who walks through out door will benefit, regardless of what Discourse they bring with them.
I could probably go rambling on for quite a while more but I think I'll stop. Hopefully my point came across with some semblance of clarity. I realize that I made no direct application to teaching math but this principle is universal in nature and thus applies as well as any other to my subject. It's these subtleties of teaching that make it such a complex art form and which challenge and drive me to become better. To quote one other professor in the math department, "Teaching is nothing like brain surgery. It's far more complex." And I wouldn't have it any other way.
